As they say, “Emerging States”. We’ll break these states individually as needed. Reporting is due May 31 but no fees yet. Consumer only, not B2B (although WA is vague on this).
Guidance we’ve received from trade association indicate all these states are consumer only for this first “simplified” reporting cycle.
I agree, and CAA has mentioned this on webinars (I will see if I can find the specific reference because I think I remember them mentioning Washington was less clear). I think good practice is to keep that trade association guidance on file in case there are ever questions about your methodology.
Do we know if consumer hazardous products are in/out of scope for MN, MD & WA? I’m seeing in scope for MD (for the most part with a few exceptions for narrow criteria) and WA and out of scope for MN.
I will try to research. What would be an example of a consumer hazardous product, like a diagnostic test or something like that?